Geometry C/M6 vs Škoda Enyaq
The Geometry C/M6 and Škoda Enyaq compared on the numbers that matter — real winter range, charging speed, battery and price. ✓ marks the stronger car per row.
All specifications
Every field we track, side by side.
Price and Market
Price from
—
—
Price from Poland
—
—
Price from Europe
—
—
Availability
Unconfirmed
Unconfirmed
Service risk
Low
Low
Performance
Drivetrain
FWD
RWD
Power
152 kW / 204 hp
✓213 kW / 286 hp
0-100 km/h
6.9 s
✓6.7 s
Top speed
150 km/h
✓180 km/h
Efficiency
✓12.1 kWh/100 km
14.8 kWh/100 km
Real Range
WLTP
580 km
✓586 km
Summer mixed range
580 km
✓586 km
Winter range
464 km
0 km
Highway range
483 km
0 km
Charging
AC charger
6.6 kW
0 kW
DC peak
60 kW
0 kW
10-80% time
0 min
0 min
Range added in 15 min
0 km
0 km
Battery and Platform
Usable battery
70 kWh
✓77 kWh
Gross battery
70 kWh
✓82 kWh
Chemistry
LFP
NMC
Cell supplier
CATL
—
Architecture
400V
—
Platform voltage
400V
400V
Heat pump
✓Yes
No
V2L
No
No
V2G
No
No
Software and ADAS
Operating system
HarmonyOS
—
Screen
12.3"
—
ADAS
Level 2
—
Apple CarPlay / Android Auto
No
No
Warranty
Vehicle warranty
5 yrs
0 yrs
Battery warranty
8 yrs
0 yrs
Battery warranty distance
150 000 km
0 km
Guaranteed battery SoH
≥70%
≥70%